High Toronto construction levels aren’t high enough

In the Toronto area, purpose-built rental apartment completions surged over the past 12 months to a quarter-century high of 4,300 units. That’s good news, but constitutes less than 20 percent of the required increase in the rental stock. An additional 7,900 rental units potentially came from newly completed condos (based on 50 percent of those units being put in the rental pool by investors). Yet this still left total newly built units representing less than half of the rental stock expansion needed. It’s unlikely this rate will rise materially in the near term. The 6,600 rental apartments and 53,600 condo units under construction in the Toronto area form just 15 months’ worth of rental supply (if half of those condos end up in the rental pool). Something closer to 24 months is needed to close the gap within two years.

Other sources of rental units will help reduce the gap. The provincial and local governments in recent years eased some regulatory restrictions, which should boost the number of secondary suites (e.g. basement apartments and lane way housing). Condo investors could potentially add more rental units by buying into the existing condo market. However, it’s improbable these alternative sources can deliver the high numbers (perhaps up to 15,000 units per year) necessary to balance the Toronto rental market. Bottom line: shortages are bound to persist near term. Rental apartment construction must rise (and soon) to bring lasting relief.

Balance in sight in Vancouver

Strong apartment construction (both purpose-built rentals and condos) bodes well for achieving balance in Vancouver’s rental market within a couple of years. We see plenty of room for new supply to rise so long as a large proportion (at least 40 percent) of newly completed condos makes its way into the rental pool. A resurgence of purpose-built rental apartment projects in the past three years has been encouraging. This set off a wave of new supply now coming to market, which should eventually stabilize rent. Whether this will bring real relief to families remains to be seen. Vancouver’s rental stock is the least ‘family-friendly’ among Canada’s largest markets. Just over a quarter of purpose-built rental apartments and townhouses have two or more bedrooms, compared to half in Calgary and Toronto, and twothirds in Montreal. To help families, new rental supply must offer more options configured to suit their needs.

Rental apartment construction is booming in Montreal

An even bigger rental apartment building boom has been taking place in Montreal. Completions are ramping up significantly, reaching a decades-high of 11,500 units in the 12 months ending July 2019. That pace is almost spot on the 11,600 units needed to close the rental gap in the area, though it’s unlikely to be sustained in the period ahead with a total 15,000 units at various stages of construction. New condos will fill most of any remaining gap despite condo investors playing a lesser role in Montreal than in other major Canadian cities. More balanced market conditions will temper rent increases.

Calgary: from rental unit surplus to small deficit

We expect solid rental demand growth and low construction levels to transform Calgary’s modest rental apartment surplus into a small deficit. This will gradually raise pressure on rent— but not excessively so.

Average rent is unaffordable? Shoot for a higher vacancy rate

The right level (and mix) of rental supply is crucial to stabilize rent. Historically across Canada’s top 14 urban markets, a rental vacancy rate of slightly more than three percent has been accompanied, on average, by zero real rent increases—that is, nominal rent rising at the rate of inflation. The heat on rent intensifies significantly the closer the vacancy rate gets to one percent (and even more so when the rate falls below one percent) as is currently the case in Vancouver and Toronto. Notably, real rent generally declines when the vacancy rate climbs above three percent. So housing policy that ultimately raises a market’s vacancy rate to, say, something closer to four percent has a good chance of generating meaningful rent relief. In fact, we believe that it would be a far more effective policy than rent control—which only helps existing tenants and discourages new rental supply.

A deliberate policy to boost rental supply is needed in Toronto

As it stands, the Toronto area is least likely to eliminate its rental deficit among Canada’s largest markets. A more wilful policy approach is needed to foster the rental-supply expansion required to sustainably stabilize rent in the area—never mind offer any hope of improving rent affordability. Steps taken in the past couple of years (including making public land available for affordable rental housing projects) haven’t gone far enough. At the very least, regulatory obstacles (e.g. disadvantageous property tax treatment, overly restrictive zoning by-laws) discouraging the development of purpose-built rental apartment buildings and secondary suites must be removed.

The Ontario government’s More Housing, More Choice housing plan unveiled in June 2019—which promises to cut red tape to speed up construction approval, make development costs more predictable for developers and ease the building of different types of housing, including rental units—is a step in the right direction. But to really make things happen, the policy scale must be tipped in favour of building new rental supply (of both below– and at-market rent units). This could mean sweetening existing rental-housing construction funding programs or offering new incentives (e.g. development charge rebates) to project developers. The inducement’s size could be tied to specific policy objectives (e.g. building up the stock of below-market rent units and family-friendly apartments) being met. This would go beyond what the Toronto area will get out of the National Housing Strategy (a federal $55- billion program over 10 years), which focuses on housing for vulnerable Canadians.The Toronto region should consider emulating the City of Vancouver’s high-profile 10-year housing strategy that sets specific supply targets and provides annual progress reports.

In addition to fostering new construction, policymakers would also do well to regulate short-term rental activity (e.g. Airbnb). The focus should be on commercial operators running entire housing units as hotels in order to control—or even reverse—the loss of longer-term rental apartments. It‘s time for a deliberate policy to grow the rental stock in the Toronto area.

Story by Robert Hogue, Senior Economist, RBC

The material contained in this report is the property of Royal Bank of Canada and may not be reproduced in any way, in whole or in part, without express authorization of the copyright holder in writing. The statements and statistics contained herein have been prepared by RBC Economics Research based on information from sources considered to be reliable. We make no representation or warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy or completeness. This publication is for the information of investors and business persons and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation to buy securities.