Canada’s one stop platform and the #1 National voice to the rental housing industry

After strong winter, construction intentions for multi-family units drop in April

Posted in Appraisal, CMHC, Communications, Development, Finance, Housing, Industry Trends

After strong winter, construction intentions for multi-family units drop in April

Story by: Monika Warzecha  |  BuzzBuzzHome 

Following strong growth in March and February, construction intentions for multi-family units reversed course in April. According to Statistics Canada building permits data released Monday, Canadian municipalities authorized the construction of 12,141 multi-family units in April, down 8.1 per cent from the month before.

The total value of multi-family building permits decline 4.5 per cent in April over the previous month, with British Columbia and Alberta largely responsible for the dip. However, the value of permits was still up from March in Ontario and Quebec.

While approvals for single-family homes may have slumped earlier in the year, they rose 4.1 per cent to 5,755 in April. Overall, the value of building permits for single-family homes rose 6.6 per cent month-to-month, the first increase in three months. Increases were recorded in five provinces, led by Ontario and Alberta.

Canada-wide, construction intentions for residential buildings rose 1.2 per cent in April to $4.5 billion, the third month in a row to record an increase.

The residential sector couldn’t match the levels of growth seen in the non-residential sector, where the value of permits shot up 30.2 per cent to $3.3 billion in April. This comes on the tails of recent double-digit growth with the sector seeing a monthly gain of 24.8 per cent in March.

Most of the major municipalities saw an uptick in the value of building permits with 20 of the 34 census metropolitan areas studied by Statistics Canada seeing a boost. Toronto and Edmonton saw the biggest month-to-month increases with the former seeing a rise in the institutional buildings and multi-family dwellings while the latter saw gains for commercial buildings and, to a lesser extent, single-family dwellings.